Send donations via Zelle to: donate@philosophersforum.org
Send donations via Venmo to: Dallas
Philosophers
Lectures
start
promptly at 7:30PM and are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of each
month January 2026 through December 8, 2026. Our
meetings are held at the New
New Chinese Buffet, 3822 Belt Line
Road, Addison, TX 75001 (972) 243-1198,
Zoom access will NOT be available.
1-13-2026
Child [Mal]treatment in America
Speaker: Beth Williams
Beth Williams is a former advocate for
children in child welfare proceedings. In this presentation, she asks
the question “when is a child mistreated” as she explores the
historical context of a child’s role in society in America. A child’s
role in the world determines what constitutes maltreatment. Beth will
explore the transition from “seen and not heard” to having quasi-adult
agency before the age of legal adulthood and the paradoxical view that
persons between the ages of 18 and 25 are legal adults who need special
treatment as we learn more about brain development.
1-27-2026 Could there be instantaneous sensory experiences?
Speaker: Phillipe Chouard
Ever since William James (1890) raised
it, philosophers have struggled with the question of whether—and in
what sense—the stream of consciousness might be continuous: could it be
really continuous (in the very same sense in which the series of real
numbers is) or merely continuous subjectively (in the sense that there
doesn’t seem to be any gaps in our consciousness)? While many
philosophers remain unsure as to how to even start addressing this
question, just as many express a complete certainty that, obviously,
there cannot be any conscious sensory experience which lasts not more
than an instant. After clarifying the terms of this issue, this
presentation will critically assess some of the arguments advanced
against instantaneous experiences and suggest that, in fact, such
experiences may well be possible.
2-10-2026
Our Search for Meaning–Frankl’s Interpretation of Will
Speaker: Davidson Sutherland, MDiv
Abstract: TBD
2-24-2026 TBD
Speaker: TBD
Abstract: TBD
3-10-2026
Why Language is Significant for Justice in Augustine’s Political Thought
Speaker: Miriam McElvain
In
his early dialogue On Order, Augustine argues that human association is
rationally ordered because it arises from individuals sharing knowledge
of intelligible realities with others through language. Consequently,
for Augustine, although expressions of justice in political order are
partial and limited by the particular circumstances of the political
community, because language is a means by which human beings
communicate intelligible truths, political order is subordinate to
universal standards of justice.
3-24-2026
The Scientific Search for Self, Mind, and Will
Speaker: Paul Tobolowski, MD
Through most of human history, it has
been assumed that we exist as individual selves with independent minds
that make willful decisions. Current technology offers the opportunity
to do brain scanning as people perform mental tasks such as reading,
speaking, making decisions, perceiving the world through our sensory
systems, and thinking abstractly. The brain can even be tested in its
baseline state when it is not actively thinking. This talk is a summary
of current scientific investigations into deep philosophical
issues.
4-14-2026
In Defense of Clear-Sighted Hypocrisy
Speaker: Alida Liberman, Ph.D.
Moral
hypocrisy—understood as a lack of consistency between what you believe
you ought to do and what you actually do—is routinely condemned.
However, the presenter argues that openly embracing our own
hypocrisy—and being more accepting of hypocrisy in others—has both
instrumental and non-instrumental moral benefits. Many people resolve
the dissonance caused by a gap between their values and their actions
by engaging in self-deception, wishful thinking, or standard-lowering.
Instead, a more productive response is to be more open and honest about
your failures. Sometimes, moral improvement only occurs if one is
willing to pass through a transitional hypocritical phase that involves
opening one’s mind to the prospect of change, even while your behavior
remains stubbornly fixed. And even when such clear-sighted hypocrisy
does not lead to moral improvement, it is valuable for its own sake: it
is morally better to grapple with the uncomfortable self-knowledge of
your own shortcomings than to avoid discomfort by refusing to engage in
real self-reflection.
4-28-2026
TBD
Speaker: TBD
5-12-2026
TBD
Speaker: TBD